Ruling 891 Occupational Tax

Warning!

It seems that JavaScript is not working in your browser. It could be because it is not supported, or that JavaScript is intentionally disabled. Some of the features on CT.gov will not function properly with out javascript enabled.

Settings Menu

Language
High Contrast
High Contrast Mode On or Off switch
Font Size
Disclaimer

This is a test alert from the Office of the Governor. This alert displays across all sites under Sitecore and appears at the top of the page.

Walk-in services at all DRS branch office locations remain suspended. Email DRS at drs@po.state.ct.us. Email the Priority One Taxpayer Assistance Program: DRSPriorityOne_CollectionsAssist@po.state.ct.us. Please check our Frequently Asked Questions page.

Ruling 89-1, Occupational Tax

If you were "admitted as an attorney by the judges of the superior court"; Conn. Gen. Stat. §51-81b; then admission pro hac vice to represent a client in the federal district court at Bridgeport constituted being "engaged in the practice of law"; id.; during 1988 in Connecticut.

LEGAL DIVISION

February 27, 1989

Connecticut State Department of Revenue Services

Ruling 89-1, Occupational Tax