The above-captioned matter was scheduled to be heard as a contested case on June 7, 2013, at 2:00 P.M., at which time the respondents and their counsel appeared, but the complainant did not appear to prosecute the case.  The hearing officer notes that counsel for the respondents appeared with a witness who was prepared to testify at the contested case hearing.  The hearing officer is not aware that the complainant requested that the contested case hearing be rescheduled, or in any way informed the Commission that he was unable to appear on June 7, 2013.

     The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

     1. The complaint is hereby dismissed.

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of July 10, 2013.

__________________________
Cynthia A. Cannata
Acting Clerk of the Commission

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

Stanley Scheinman
P.O. Box 2398
Westport, CT  06880

Attorney General,
State of Connecticut,
Office of the Attorney General;
and State of Connecticut,
Office of the Attorney General
c/o Matthew J. Budzik, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General
State of Connecticut,
Office of the Attorney General
P.O. Box 120
Hartford, CT  06141-0120

____________________________
Cynthia A. Cannata
Acting Clerk of the Commission

FIC/2013-027/FD/cac/7/10/2013