TO: Freedom of Information Commission
FROM: Thomas A. Hennick
RE: Minutes of the Commission’s regular meeting of November 15, 2017
A regular meeting of the Freedom of Information Commission was held on November 15, 2017, in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. The meeting convened at 2:15 p.m. with the following Commissioners present:
Commissioner Owen P. Eagan, presiding
Commissioner Jonathan J. Einhorn
Commissioner Matthew Streeter
Commissioner Christopher P. Hankins
Commissioner Lenny T. Winkler
Commissioner Ryan P. Barry
A regular meeting of the Freedom of Information Commission was held on November 15, 2017, in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. The meeting convened at 2:15 p.m. with the following Commissioners present:
Commissioner Owen P. Eagan, presiding
Commissioner Jonathan J. Einhorn
Commissioner Matthew Streeter
Commissioner Christopher P. Hankins
Commissioner Lenny T. Winkler
Commissioner Ryan P. Barry
Also present were staff members, Colleen M. Murphy, Mary E. Schwind, Victor R. Perpetua, Tracie C. Brown, Kathleen K. Ross, Lisa F. Siegel, Valicia D. Harmon, Paula S. Pearlman, Cindy Cannata, and Thomas A. Hennick.
The Commissioners unanimously voted to approve the Commission’s regular meeting minutes of October 25, 2017.
Those in attendance were informed that the Commission does not ordinarily record the remarks made at its meetings, but will do so on request.
Docket #FIC 2016-0859 Christopher Shuckra v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Britain; and Police Department, City of New Britain
Docket #FIC 2016-0859 Christopher Shuckra v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Britain; and Police Department, City of New Britain
Christopher Shuckra participated via speakerphone. The Commissioners unanimously voted
to amend the Hearing Officer’s Report. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing
Officer’s Report as amended.*
to amend the Hearing Officer’s Report. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing
Officer’s Report as amended.*
Docket #FIC 2017-0053 Maleek Jones v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Haven; Police Department, City of New Haven; City of New Haven; Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Correction; and State of Connecticut, Department of Correction
Maleek Jones participated via speakerphone. Attorney Kathleen Foster appeared on behalf of the
New Haven respondents. Attorney Nicole Anker appeared on behalf of the Department of Correction respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report. The proceedings were recorded digitally.
Docket #FIC 2017-0089 Clarence Patterson v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Correction; and State of Connecticut, Department of Correction
Clarence Patterson participated via speakerphone. Attorney Nicole Anker appeared on behalf
of the respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s
Report. The proceedings were recorded digitally.
of the respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s
Report. The proceedings were recorded digitally.
Docket #FIC 2017-0148 Bryan Jordan v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Haven; Police Department, City of New Haven; City of New Haven; Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Correction; and State of Connecticut, Department of Correction
The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
Docket #FIC 2017-0036 Jay Hardison v. Superintendent of Schools, Darien Public Schools; and Darien Public Schools
Jay Hardison appeared on his own behalf. Attorney Richard Mills appeared on behalf of the
respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
The proceedings were recorded digitally.
respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
The proceedings were recorded digitally.
Docket #FIC 2017-0068 Jay Hardison v. Superintendent of Schools, Darien Public Schools; and Darien Public Schools
Jay Hardison appeared on his own behalf. Attorney Richard Mills appeared on behalf of the respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report. The proceedings were recorded digitally.
Docket #FIC 2017-0047 Karl Hansson v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Insurance; and State of Connecticut, Department of Insurance
The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
Docket #FIC 2017-0077 John R. Williams v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health; and State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health
The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
Docket #FIC 2017-0081 Ed Schwing v. Board of Selectmen, Town of Haddam; and Town of Haddam
Ed Schwing appeared on his own behalf. Attorney Brian Hoeing appeared on behalf of the
respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
Docket #FIC 2017-0082 Michael Bracken, Jr. v. Christopher Kervick, First Selectman, Town of Windsor Locks; Board of Selectmen, Town of Windsor Locks; and Town of Windsor Locks
respondents. The Commissioners unanimously voted to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report.
Docket #FIC 2017-0082 Michael Bracken, Jr. v. Christopher Kervick, First Selectman, Town of Windsor Locks; Board of Selectmen, Town of Windsor Locks; and Town of Windsor Locks
Michael Bracken Jr. appeared on his own behalf. Attorney Carl Landolina appeared on behalf of the respondents. The Commissioners voted, 5-0, to amend the Hearing Officer’s Report. The Commissioners voted, 5-0, to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report as amended.* Commissioner Barry did not participate in this matter.
Docket #FIC 2017-0083 Michael Bracken, Jr. v. Eric Osanitsch, Chief, Police Department, Town of Windsor Locks; Police Department, Town of Windsor Locks; and Town of Windsor Locks
Michael Bracken Jr. appeared on his own behalf. Attorney Carl Landolina appeared on behalf of the respondents. The Commissioners voted, 5-0, to amend the Hearing Officer’s Report. The Commissioners voted, 5-0, to adopt the Hearing Officer’s Report as amended.* Commissioner Barry did not participate in this matter.
Docket #FIC 2017-0358 Deanna Bouchard v. Arthur Shilosky, First Selectman, Town of Colchester; Tricia Dean, FOI Coordinator, Town of Colchester; and Town of Colchester
The matter was removed from the agenda.
The Commissioners voted, 5-0, to approve a Motion for Reconsideration dated November 6, 2017 and received by the Commission on November 6, 2017, filed by James Torlai in James Torlai v. Chief, Police Department, City of Waterbury; Police Department, City of Waterbury; and City of Waterbury, Docket #FIC 2016-0821 and ordered the matter reopened and returned to the Hearing Officer for further consideration. Commissioner Barry did not participate in this matter. Attorney Richard Scappini addressed the Commission on behalf of the Waterbury Police Department and the City of Waterbury.
The Commissioners voted, 5-0, to affirm the Executive Director’s decision not to schedule in Torrey Townsend v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection; and State of Connecticut, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Docket # FIC 2017-0062; Torrey Townsend v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Correction; and State of Connecticut, Department of Correction, Docket # FIC 2017-0063; Torrey Townsend v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health; and State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, Docket # FIC 2017-0064 and Torrey Townsend v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Haven; Police Department, City of New Haven; and City of New Haven, Docket # FIC 2017-0162. The matter was recorded digitally. Commissioner Barry did not participate in this matter.
The Commissioners voted, 4-0, to deny the Respondents' Petition for Administrative Appeal from the Order of the Hearing Officer Re: In Camera Inspection and Order Denying Reconsideration and Respondents' Application to Stay Enforcement of Administrative Order Pending Appeal in Docket #FIC 2017-0310, Josh Kovner and the Hartford Courant v. Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Correction; and State of Connecticut, Department of Correction. Commissioner Barry did not participate in this matter. Commissioner Einhorn recused himself from this matter.
Colleen M. Murphy reported on pending appeals.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
______________
Thomas A. Hennick
MINREGmeeting 11152017/tah/11162017
Thomas A. Hennick
MINREGmeeting 11152017/tah/11162017
* See Attached for Amendments
AMENDMENTS
Docket #FIC 2016-0859 Christopher Shuckra v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Britain; and Police Department, City of New Britain
The Hearing Officer’s report is amended as follows:
Docket #FIC 2016-0859 Christopher Shuckra v. Chief, Police Department, City of New Britain; and Police Department, City of New Britain
The Hearing Officer’s report is amended as follows:
[13. It is found that although the complainant has not withdrawn his appeal, the respondents provided copies of all the records requested by the complainant in the manner that he specified.
14. It is concluded that the respondents did not violate the FOI Act as alleged.]
13. AS OF THE DATE OF THE HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT IN THIS MATTER, THE COMMISSION HAD NOT RECEIVED A LETTER OF WITHDRAWAL. HOWEVER AT THE NOVEMBER 15, 2017 COMMISSION MEETING, THE COMPLAINANT INDICATED HE WISHED TO WITHDRAW HIS COMPLAINT.
Docket #FIC 2017-0082 Michael Bracken, Jr. v. Christopher Kervick, First Selectman, Town of Windsor Locks; Board of Selectmen, Town of Windsor Locks; and Town of Windsor Locks
The Hearing Officer’s Report was amended as follows:
8. It is found that, in the executive session, the [town attorney] FIRST SELECTMAN presented terms for a casino proposal in Windsor Locks.
19. With respect to the complainants’ allegation described in paragraph 3.a., above, the respondents contend that the executive session was permissible pursuant to §§1-200(6)(E) and 1-210(b)(1), G.S., on the grounds that the executive session was [confined] CONVENED to discuss a preliminary draft.
19. With respect to the complainants’ allegation described in paragraph 3.a., above, the respondents contend that the executive session was permissible pursuant to §§1-200(6)(E) and 1-210(b)(1), G.S., on the grounds that the executive session was [confined] CONVENED to discuss a preliminary draft.
20. It is found, however, that the respondents offered no evidence to prove [that a preliminary draft was discussed in the executive session, or] that the respondents determined that the public interest in withholding such a document clearly outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
21. It is therefore concluded that the respondents violated the FOI Act by entering into executive session for an improper [person] PURPOSE.
Docket #FIC 2017-0083 Michael Bracken, Jr. v. Eric Osanitsch, Chief, Police Department, Town of Windsor Locks; Police Department, Town of Windsor Locks; and Town of Windsor Locks
The order in the Hearing Officer’s Report was amended as follows:
3. FORTHWITH, THE RESPONDENTS SHALL CONTACT THE STAFF OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION TO SCHEDULE A FORMAL TRAINING SESSION. ALL TOWN OFFICIALS SHOULD BE INVITED TO THIS SESSION.